Task 1
Generate ideas for an innovative product or service. Focus on the following key steps:
- Idea generation
- Opportunity evaluation and SWOT
- New product/service planning
- Market research for the new idea
[Unit: Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Learning Outcome (LO): 1]
Task 2
- Select a target market for the new product/service
- Analyse the target market and select an appropriate market segment
- Identify one main customer group for your new product/service and explain each element of their consumer decision-making process
- Explain how ethical issues can affect the relationship between your organisation’s marketing mix for the new product or service and the behaviour of its consumer
- Evaluate the impact of the marketing mix’s 4 Ps on consumer behaviour for your selected market
[Unit: Entrepreneurship and Innovation; LO2. Unit: Consumer Behaviour; LO2 and LO3]
Task 3
Develop a marketing and integrated promotional plan for the new product/service to meet the needs of your organisation’s global target markets. This plan must clearly show:
- Communication processes and current trends in advertising and promotion, including the impact of ICT and the internet
- Measurable goals and objectives
- Strategies for monitoring and control of the marketing and promotional plan
[Unit: Marketing Communications:; LO1 and LO3]
Assignment Word Count
Max. 6000 words across all tasks.
Back to Contents
Copyright © EduQual Ltd. 2019
| Page 5 of 7 | |||||
| Criteria and Mark Scheme | |||||
| Performance Criteria | Marks | Comments | Mark | ||
| allocated | Given | ||||
| Task 1 | 27 | ||||
| Generate ideas for an innovative | |||||
| product or service. Focus on the | |||||
| following key steps: | |||||
| a) | Idea generation | ||||
| b) | Opportunity evaluation and SWOT | ||||
| c) | New product/service planning | ||||
| d) | Market research for the new idea | ||||
| EI: LO1 | |||||
| Task 2 | 36 | ||||
| a) | Select a target market for the new | ||||
| b) | product/service | ||||
| Analyse the target market and | |||||
| select an appropriate market | |||||
| c) | segment | ||||
| Identify one main customer group | |||||
| for your new product/service and | |||||
| explain each element of their | |||||
| d) | consumer decision-making process | ||||
| Explain how ethical issues can affect | |||||
| the relationship between your | |||||
| organisation’s marketing mix for the | |||||
| new product or service and the | |||||
| e) | behaviour of its consumers | ||||
| Evaluate the impact of the | |||||
| marketing mix’s 4 Ps on consumer | |||||
| behaviour for your selected market | |||||
| EI: LO2. CB: LO2 & LO3 | |||||
| Task 3 | 27 | ||||
| Develop a marketing and integrated | |||||
| promotional plan for the new | |||||
| product/service to meet the needs of | |||||
| your organisation’s global target | |||||
| markets. This plan must clearly show: | |||||
| a) | Communication processes and | ||||
| current trends in advertising and | |||||
| promotion, including the impact of | |||||
| b) | ICT and the internet | ||||
| Measurable goals and objectives | |||||
| c) | Strategies for monitoring and | ||||
| control of the marketing and | |||||
| promotional plan | |||||
| MC: LO1 & LO3 | |||||
Back to Contents
Copyright © EduQual Ltd. 2019
Page 6 of 7
| Structure and Format (2 marks) | 10 |
- Relevance to the tasks,
| professional tone and format | |||
| of response | |||
| Harvard Referencing (8 marks) | |||
| • | In-text citation | ||
| • | Bibliography, listed correctly | ||
| and correlates to references | |||
| made | |||
| • | Accurate, correctly-formatted | ||
| footnotes | |||
| • | Integration of: supporting | ||
| concepts, frameworks, critical | |||
| thinking | |||
| Total Mark | 100 | ||
Back to Contents
Copyright © EduQual Ltd. 2019
| Page 7 of 7 | |||
| Assessment Criteria for all Assessments | |||
| Marks | Criteria | ||
| 70-100 | • | The answer submitted has an outstanding result with negligible amount of mistakes. | |
| • | The answer shows an appreciative level of knowledge and clear understanding of related models, | ||
| theories and frameworks. Analytical techniques used show the wide area of knowledge the learner | |||
| has. | |||
| • | The ability to apply and contextualise the models, theories and frameworks are clearly | ||
| recognisable. | |||
| • | The analysis and the use of research data, as well as the ability to use the data to reach acceptable | ||
| and accurate conclusions is exceptional. | |||
| • | Answers show independent thought and clarity of the learner answer has led to an overall focused | ||
| and evaluative answer. | |||
| • | The answer has followed proper Harvard referencing. | ||
| 60-69 | • | The answer shows an above average standard with few errors. | |
| • | The answer shows a decent level of knowledge and fairly clear understanding of related models, | ||
| theories and frameworks. There is a very good level, and use of, analytical techniques that is | |||
| obvious throughout the answer. | |||
| • | The ability to apply and contextualise the models, theories and frameworks are of a good | ||
| standard. | |||
| • | The analysis and the use of research data, as well as the ability to use the data to reach acceptable | ||
| and accurate conclusions is above average level. | |||
| • | Answers show independent thought and clarity of the learner answer has led to an overall focused | ||
| and evaluative answer with little inconsistency. | |||
| • | The answer has followed proper Harvard referencing. | ||
| 50-59 | • | The answer shows an above average standard with errors. | |
| • | The answer shows a general level of knowledge and a fairly clear understanding of related models, | ||
| theories and frameworks. There is a good level, and use of, analytical techniques that is obvious | |||
| throughout the answer. | |||
| • | The ability to apply and contextualise the models, theories and frameworks are of a reasonable | ||
| standard. However, the link between theory and practical knowledge appears to be | |||
| restricted/limited. | |||
| • | The answer shows more assumptions than conclusive deductions/evidences and valid arguments. | ||
| However, the ability to interpret and evaluate is evident. | |||
| • | Answers show independent thought and clarity of the learner answer has led to an overall focused | ||
| and evaluative answer with some inconsistencies. | |||
| • | The answer has followed Harvard referencing at an acceptable level. | ||
| 40-49 | • | There are several shortcomings throughout the answer. | |
| • | The knowledge level reflected in the answer is limited, especially in understanding of related | ||
| models, theories and frameworks. | |||
| • | The case material has been repeated instead of evidencing knowledge. | ||
| • | The use of analytical techniques is inadequate. | ||
| • | A certain level of relevance is evidence in Harvard referencing. | ||
| 30-39 | • | Answer submitted is quite weak and lacks proper focus. | |
| • | The answer shows a number of spelling errors and/or poor grammar/syntax. | ||
| • | The lack of understanding in subject knowledge, related models, theories and frameworks is | ||
| evident. | |||
| • | Contextualisation, interpretation, and evaluation are of a poor standard. | ||
| • | Reflects only basic levels of Harvard referencing. | ||
| 0-29 | • | Requires more work on answering skills; overall output is well below the required standard. | |
| Answer has little relevance to the assignment briefs. Spelling/syntax poor. | |||
| • | Little or no evidence of appropriate subject knowledge. | ||
| • | Use of models, theories and frameworks is quite poor. | ||
| • | Little to no evidence of, and/or unacceptable mistakes in, Harvard referencing. | ||
| The overall Pass Mark for this Assignment is 40%. | |||
| Back to Contents | |||
| Copyright © EduQual Ltd. 2019 | |||