Title: Innovation capacity, international
experience and export performance of SMEs in the field of information
technology of Vietnam
Abstract: Although there are many assessments of the innovation capacity of enterprises, there is still a lack of assessment of the innovation capacity of small and medium enterprises in the information technology sector related to the 4th industrial revolution. structure must be determined from a practical point of view using existing innovation capacity studies. Therefore, this study aims to improve understanding of the characteristics of innovation capacity in the context of small and medium enterprises in the field of information technology by reviewing the empirical literature. This article presents international experiences, assessment models and applicability of models to the characteristics of small and medium-sized enterprises in the field of information technology. With the main contribution, the article identifies an overview of growing research around the world on innovation capacity and lessons learned for small and medium enterprises in Vietnam. The research results will contribute to improving understanding of the special characteristics of the innovation capacity of small and medium enterprises in the field of information technology and especially in the context of the 4th industrial revolution. The described innovation capacity characterization can guide further studies by providing criteria for how innovation capacity in small businesses can be understood. Furthermore, using the findings of this assessment, managers can improve the innovation capacity of their businesses by acknowledging many aspects of innovation capacity.
Keyword: Innovation
Capability, Systematic review, Innovation performance, SME, Performance
management
1. Overview of innovation capacity
2. Characteristics of small and medium-sized enterprises in the field of information technology
3. Introduction and analysis of methods and tools for assessing innovation capacity of enterprises
4. Some analysis and recommendations on the application of tools or methods to assess innovation capacity for information technology enterprises
5. Recommend a set of indicators to evaluate innovation capacity for enterprises
6. Conclusion
References
[1] M. Saunila, “Innovation
capability in SMEs: A systematic review of the literature,” J. Innov. Knowl.,
vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 260–265, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2019.11.002.
[2] E. Costa, A. L. Soares,
and J. P. De Sousa, “Information, knowledge and collaboration management in the
internationalisation of SMEs: A systematic literature review,” Int. J. Inf.
Manage., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 557–569, 2016, doi:
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.03.007.
[3] D. A. de J. Pacheco, C.
S. ten Caten, C. F. Jung, J. L. D. Ribeiro, H. V. G. Navas, and V. A.
Cruz-Machado, “Eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs: Systematic
review and research directions,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 142, pp.
2277–2287, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.049.
[4] M. M. Oura, S. N.
Zilber, and E. L. Lopes, “Innovation capacity, international experience and
export performance of SMEs in Brazil,” Int. Bus. Rev., vol. 25, no. 4,
pp. 921–932, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.12.002.
[5] F. Rossi, A. Caloffi,
A. Colovic, and M. Russo, “New business models for public innovation
intermediaries supporting emerging innovation systems: The case of the Internet
of Things,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 175, no. July 2020, p.
121357, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121357.
[6] C. Lee and J. Hwang,
“The influence of giant platform on content diversity,” Technol. Forecast.
Soc. Change, vol. 136, pp. 157–165, 2018, doi:
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.029.
[7] D. D. T. Pham, P. Paillé,
and N. Halilem, “Systematic review on environmental innovativeness: A
knowledge-based resource view,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 211, pp.
1088–1099, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.221.
[8] D. R. Shaw and T.
Allen, “Studying innovation ecosystems using ecology theory,” Technol.
Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 136, pp. 88–102, 2018, doi:
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.030.
[9] D. Jugend, P. D. C.
Fiorini, F. Armellini, and A. G. Ferrari, “Public support for innovation: A
systematic review of the literature and implications for open innovation,” Technol.
Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 156, no. December 2019, p. 119985, 2020, doi:
10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119985.
[10] M. G. Russell and N. V.
Smorodinskaya, “Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation,” Technol.
Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 136, no. February, pp. 114–131, 2018, doi:
10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.024.
[11] S. Mamonov and R.
Peterson, “The role of IT in organizational innovation – A systematic
literature review,” J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., vol. 30, no. 4, p. 101696,
2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101696.
[12] J. Luo, “Architecture
and evolvability of innovation ecosystems,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change,
vol. 136, no. June 2017, pp. 132–144, 2018, doi:
10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.033.
[13] N. Zahoor and O. Al-Tabbaa,
“Inter-organizational collaboration and SMEs’ innovation: A systematic review
and future research directions,” Scand. J. Manag., vol. 36, no. 2, p.
101109, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2020.101109.
[14] Y. S. Su, Y. Kajikawa,
M. Tsujimoto, and J. Chen, “Innovation ecosystems: Theory, evidence, practice,
and implications,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 136, no.
September, pp. 14–17, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.009.
[15] M. L. Moore, S. von der
Porten, R. Plummer, O. Brandes, and J. Baird, “Water policy reform and
innovation: A systematic review,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 38, pp.
263–271, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.007.
[16] D. Vrontis and M.
Christofi, “R&D internationalization and innovation: A systematic review,
integrative framework and future research directions,” J. Bus. Res.,
vol. 128, no. December 2018, pp. 812–823, 2021, doi:
10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.031.
[17] B. Walrave, M. Talmar,
K. S. Podoynitsyna, A. G. L. Romme, and G. P. J. Verbong, “A multi-level
perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation,” Technol.
Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 136, no. September 2015, pp. 103–113, 2018,
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.011.
[18] Q. H. Vuong, V. P. La,
T. T. Vuong, H. K. T. Nguyen, M. T. Ho, and M. T. Ho, “What have Vietnamese
scholars learned from researching entrepreneurship? A Systematic review,” Heliyon,
vol. 6, no. 4, p. e03808, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03808.
[19] A. Mardani, D. Kannan,
R. E. Hooker, S. Ozkul, M. Alrasheedi, and E. B. Tirkolaee, “Evaluation of
green and sustainable supply chain management using structural equation
modelling: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and
recommendations for future research,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 249, 2020,
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119383.
The post Title: Innovation capacity, international
experience and export performance of S appeared first on blitzarchive.com.