The above diagram covers the 3 different Scrum roles, 4 Scrum Ceremonies, and Scrum artefacts – it represents Scrum ‘in a nutshell’. Your report must describe and explain the components of this diagram: Describe the scrum roles and what they are responsible for. Describe the Agile ceremonies and what is done in each ceremony. Explain how the scrum roles participate in these ceremonies. How do the ceremonies contribute to the three pillars of Scrum? Which agile principles from the Agile Manifesto align to which ceremony, artefact and/or practice, explaining why you believe this to be the case. Where does the Business Analyst fit in to this picture and what contributions do they make to the various artefacts and ceremonies that you have discussed?
|
ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF |
|
|
Subject Code and Title |
Agile Business Analysis |
|
Assessment |
Agile Business Analysis Report |
|
Individual/Group |
Individual |
|
Length |
1500 words (+/- 10%) |
|
Learning Outcomes |
The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful |
|
completion of the task below include: |
|
|
d) Communicate agile methods, processes, and approaches with |
|
|
stakeholders in order to address organisational requirements. |
|
|
Submission |
|
|
Weighting |
|
|
Total Marks |
|
Task Summary
For this individual assessment, you will be required to research and write a 1500-word report on agile methods, processes, and the agile approach. This report needs to be written from the perspective of explaining Agile to someone who has no understanding of the Agile approach, as if it is being implemented in an organisation for the first time. Agile has several different frameworks or methodologies however Scrum roles, processes and tools/artefacts are found in most if not all Agile frameworks.

The above diagram covers the 3 different Scrum roles, 4 Scrum Ceremonies, and Scrum artefacts – it represents Scrum ‘in a nutshell’. Your report must describe and explain the components of this diagram:
-
Describe the scrum roles and what they are responsible for.
-
Describe the Agile ceremonies and what is done in each ceremony.
-
Explain how the scrum roles participate in these ceremonies.
-
How do the ceremonies contribute to the three pillars of Scrum?
-
Which agile principles from the Agile Manifesto align to which ceremony, artefact and/or practice, explaining why you believe this to be the case.
-
Where does the Business Analyst fit in to this picture and what contributions do they make to the various artefacts and ceremonies that you have discussed?
Context
As organisations have started to adopt an Agile approach to software development, the role of the Business Analyst has evolved from longer analysis and design activities done from initiation to completion, to a world where software is produced iteratively is smaller release in sprints. For you to succeed in a role as an Agile Business Analyst will require an understanding of agile methods processes and approaches.
Task Instructions
Report Structure
The report is brief and therefore will not require and executive summary or abstract.
-
Introduction (175-200 words): Also serve as your statement of purpose for the report. This means that you will tell the reader what you are going to cover in your report. You will need to inform the reader of:
-
-
Your area of research and its context
-
-
-
The key concepts you will be addressing,
-
-
-
What the reader can expect to find in the body of the report
-
-
Body of the report (1000 – 1100 words)
-
-
-
Describe the scrum roles and what they are responsible for.
-
-
-
-
-
Describe the Agile ceremonies and what is done in each ceremony.
-
-
-
-
-
Explain how the scrum roles participate in these ceremonies.
-
-
-
-
-
How do the ceremonies contribute to the three pillars of Scrum?
-
-
-
-
-
Which agile principles from the Agile Manifesto align to which ceremony, artefact and/ or practice, explaining why you believe this to be the case.
-
-
-
-
-
Where does the Business Analyst fit in to this picture and what contributions do they make to the various artefacts and ceremonies that you have discussed?
-
-
-
Conclusion (175 – 200 words): summarise any findings that the report puts forward regarding the concepts covered in the report.
Layout
The report should use font Arial or Calibri 11 point, should be line spaced at 1.5 for ease of reading and page numbers on the bottom of each page.
With the required diagrams due attention should be given to pagination to avoid loss of meaning and continuity by unnecessarily splitting information over two pages. Diagrams must carry the appropriate captioning.
Referencing
Assessment Rubric
|
Fail |
Pass |
Credit |
Distinction |
High Distinction |
|||||||||||||
|
Assessment |
(Yet to achieve |
||||||||||||||||
|
(Functional) |
(Proficient) |
(Advanced) |
(Exceptional) |
||||||||||||||
|
Attributes |
minimum standard) |
||||||||||||||||
|
50-64% |
65-74% |
75-84% |
85-100% |
||||||||||||||
|
0-49% |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Knowledge and |
Lack of understanding of |
Limited understanding of |
Adequate knowledge or |
Thorough understanding of |
Highly developed |
||||||||||||
|
understanding |
the required concepts and |
required concepts and |
understanding of the |
the key concepts. |
understanding of the field |
||||||||||||
|
knowledge. |
knowledge. |
required concepts. |
or discipline/s. |
||||||||||||||
|
Understanding of the |
Discriminates between |
||||||||||||||||
|
key concepts of Agile |
Key components of the |
Some of the key components |
A reasonable capacity to |
assertion of opinion and |
Systematically and critically |
||||||||||||
|
methods, processes and |
assignment are not |
of the assignment are not |
explain and apply relevant |
information substantiated |
discriminates between |
||||||||||||
|
the Agile approach. |
addressed. |
addressed. |
key concepts. |
by robust evidence from |
assertion of opinion and |
||||||||||||
|
the research/course |
information substantiated |
||||||||||||||||
|
Lack of application, and |
Limited application and |
Supports opinion and |
materials and extended |
by robust evidence from |
|||||||||||||
|
25% |
analysis of information to |
analysis to provide clear |
information substantiated |
reading. |
the research/course |
||||||||||||
|
provide clear |
recommendations. |
by evidence from research |
materials and extended |
||||||||||||||
|
recommendations. |
to provide |
Well demonstrated capacity |
reading. |
||||||||||||||
|
recommendations. |
to apply and analyse |
||||||||||||||||
|
relevant information to |
Recommendations are |
||||||||||||||||
|
provide clear |
clearly justified based on |
||||||||||||||||
|
recommendations. |
the application and analysis |
||||||||||||||||
|
of information. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Analysis and |
Limited synthesis and |
Demonstrated analysis and |
Well-developed analysis |
Thoroughly developed and |
Highly sophisticated and |
||||||||||||
|
application with |
analysis. |
synthesis of new knowledge |
and synthesis with |
sound analysis and |
creative analysis, synthesis |
||||||||||||
|
synthesis of new |
with application. |
application of |
synthesis with application |
of new with existing |
|||||||||||||
|
knowledge |
Limited |
recommendations linked to |
of pretested models and / |
knowledge. |
|||||||||||||
|
application/recommendat |
Shows the ability to interpret |
analysis/synthesis. |
or independently |
||||||||||||||
|
Demonstrates a |
ions based upon analysis. |
relevant information and |
developed models and |
Strong application by way |
|||||||||||||
|
understanding of the |
literature. |
justified recommendations |
of pretested models and / |
||||||||||||||
|
Agile approach, the |
linked to analysis/synthesis. |
or independently |
|||||||||||||||
|
Scrum process, Agile |
developed models. |
||||||||||||||||
|
teams and the role of |
Recommendations are |
||||||||||||||||
|
the Business Analyst. |
clearly justified based on |
||||||||||||||||
|
the analysis/synthesis. |
|||||
|
35% |
Applying knowledge to new |
||||
|
situations/other cases. |
|||||
|
Effective |
Presents information. |
Communicates in a readable |
Communicates in a |
Communicates coherently |
Communicates eloquently. |
|
Communication |
manner that largely adheres |
coherent and readable |
and concisely in a manner |
Expresses meaning |
|
|
(Written) |
Specialised language and |
to the given format. |
manner that adheres to the |
that adheres to the given |
coherently, concisely and |
|
terminology is rarely or |
given format. |
format. |
creatively within the given |
||
|
inaccurately employed. |
Generally employs specialised |
format. |
|||
|
language and terminology |
Accurately employs |
Accurately employs a wide |
|||
|
Meaning is repeatedly |
with accuracy. |
specialised language and |
range of specialised |
Discerningly selects and |
|
|
obscured by errors in the |
terminology. |
language and terminology. |
precisely employs a wide |
||
|
communication of ideas, |
Meaning is sometimes |
range of specialised |
|||
|
20% |
including errors in |
difficult to follow. |
Meaning is easy to follow. |
Engages audience interest. |
language and terminology. |
|
structure, sequence, |
Information, arguments and |
Information, arguments and |
Information, arguments and |
||
|
spelling, grammar, |
evidence are structured and |
evidence are structured and |
evidence are structured and |
Engages and sustains |
|
|
punctuation and/or the |
sequenced in a way that is |
sequenced in a way that is |
sequenced in a way that is, |
audience’s interest. |
|
|
acknowledgment of |
not always clear and logical. |
clear and logical. |
clear and persuasive. |
Information, arguments |
|
|
sources. |
and evidence are insightful, |
||||
|
Some errors are evident in |
Occasional minor errors |
Spelling, grammar and |
persuasive and expertly |
||
|
spelling, grammar and/or |
present in spelling, |
punctuation are free from |
presented. |
||
|
punctuation. |
grammar and/or |
errors. |
|||
|
punctuation. |
Spelling, grammar and |
||||
|
punctuation are free from |
|||||
|
errors. |
|||||
|
Use of academic and |
Poorly written with |
Written according to |
Written according to |
Well-written and adheres to |
Expertly written and |
|
discipline conventions |
informal tone, using first |
academic genre as per the |
academic genre as per the |
the academic genre as per |
adheres to the academic |
|
person pronouns (I, my, |
assignment brief. Minor |
assignment brief. |
the assignment brief. |
genre as per the |
|
|
Formal tone |
we, me, us) and does not |
errors in the use of first- |
assignment brief. |
||
|
adhere to the assignment |
person pronouns (I, my, we, |
Demonstrates consistent |
Consistently demonstrates |
||
|
Meets the assignment |
brief of the requirements |
me, us). |
use of credible and relevant |
expert use of good quality, |
Demonstrates expert use of |
|
brief regarding |
for a short business |
research sources to support |
credible and relevant |
high-quality credible and |
|
|
introduction, body and |
report. |
Introduction attempted but |
and develop ideas. |
research sources to support |
relevant research sources |
|
conclusion. |
very generic does not clearly |
and develop appropriate |
to support and develop |
||
|
state the purpose of the |
arguments and statements. |
arguments and position |
No use of first party perspective
Appropriate use of credible resources, Correct citation of key resources using APA style of referencing
20%
No introduction
attempted.
Conclusion not
attempted.
Demonstrates inconsistent and inadequate use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.
No use of in-text references, or no reference list at the close of the report. There are many mistakes in using the APA style.
report and what the reader should expect to find in the body of the report.
Conclusion attempted but does not include summation of key concepts discussed in the report and/or key conclusions or recommendations.
Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.
Little use of in-text referencing, or inadequate references consulted and added to references at the close of the report. There are some mistakes in using APA style.
Sound use of the introduction but does not clearly state either the purpose of the report or what the reader should expect to find in the body of the report.
Sound use of the conclusion and succeeds in either the summation of key concepts discussed, or key conclusions or recommendations, but not both.
Good use of in-text referencing and appropriate number of references used and listed in the reference list. There are only minor errors in using the APA style.
Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading.
Good use of the introduction which clearly states the purpose of the report and what the reader should expect to find in the body of the report.
Good use of the conclusion and succeeds in summation of key concepts discussed and key conclusions or recommendations.
Very good use of in-text referencing. All in-text references match with references listed in the reference list. There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading.
Excellent use of the introduction which secures the attention of the reader, clearly states the purpose of the report and what the reader should expect to find in the body of the report.
Excellent use of the conclusion which succeeds in confident summation of key concepts and conclusions and gives the reader a clear sense of next steps required.
Excellent and meticulous use of in-text referencing with all in-text references matching with references listed in the reference list. There are no mistakes in using the APA style.