Limited time offer

Get 25% off your order

Use the code below at checkout — offer expires soon.

Your promo codeNURSE24
25%
Expires in: 10:00
Claim my 25% discount
LIMITED OFFER Get 25% off — use code BESTW25 | No AI No Plagiarism On-Time Delivery Free Revisions Claim Now
Skip to content
Get Help Now
Uncategorized

INITIAL POST SATURDAY-TUESDAY AND REPLIES TUESDAY-FRIDAY. As you can see from th

INITIAL POST SATURDAY-TUESDAY AND REPLIES TUESDAY-FRIDAY.
As you can see from the syllabus, EUH 2001 is really a tale of two eras (okay, maybe 3)…the pre-French Revolution and the post-French Revolution eras. Or, maybe another way to say it is that over the 19th century, a series of philosophical debates swirl through Europe, dividing the era before the Revolution from the era that emerges after the Revolution, seen most clearly as the world swung into the 20th century. These various “issues” or “concepts can be seen below in pairs showing linkage.
Liberalism and Conservatism
Nationalism and Romanticism
Industrialism and Urbanism
Socialism and Marxism
Imperialism and Social Darwinism
At the same time, a major “ism” that emerges was “nationalism” (its complementary concept was Romanticism). So, what does nationalism mean, or did it mean in the 1820-1880 period of time? While Romanticism is often mostly associated with either a Literature class or maybe a Humanities concept, the emergence of Romanticism at this point is huge. So, how does Romanticism influence or support nationalism?
Don’t just quote something from Websters Dictionary, but rather demonstrate that you can see how these grew out of the French Revolution and the actions of Napoleon. Don’t try to talk about every example, but do contribute some examples of these two “isms” in action in the years after the Revolution. You might even simply focus on one in your first post, rather than trying to tackle both.
For either ideas, work to tie these 19th century concepts with our modern day issues such as Britain’s decision to leave the EU or the debate about rights for individuals, especially the debate between citizens and refugees.