How the US government could have handled the incarceration of Japanese Americans after Pearl Harbor.

I need to write a paper highlighting an ethical dilemma or propose an ethical dilemma that I would like to antagonize. Use ethical reasoning and deductive arguments to respond to this ethical dilemma by taking a specific stance and doing research to provide support and evidence for your stance. I have thought about writing about how the US government could have handled the incarceration of Japanese Americans after Pearl Harbor. What could have the US instead done? Also trying to compare such instances from the present to see if such practices of wrongfully persecuting an entire group of people still exist.