evaluative report

Unit Handbook (1 of 104) references. Your evaluative report will look almost professional and will be comprehensive, considered and insightful, and will demonstrate an excellent understanding of multimedia and of your working processes. 60-69% -Very Good Your piece is almost complete and satisfying, showing a clear understanding of and ability to apply tools and techniques with creativity and flair. It will be substantial and use a range of media types in imaginative and effective ways, although these may not always be perfectly realised. Planning, experimentation and research will have supported your creative and development processes, which are well documented. Your wiki entries will be substantial, well written, and you will have discussed the examples with insight. Your evaluative report shows both a very good understanding of multimedia and a reflective and considered approach to your work. 50-59% – Good Your piece is largely complete and substantial, responds to the brief and shows some understanding of and ability to apply methods and tools covered in class, although results may not always be convincing or of high quality. It will use a range of media types but will be conventional in nature with only limited evidence of creativity and imagination. Planning and research will be limited but will have been useful in making your creative decisions and your wiki entries will be informed, but may have some minor errors. Your report will explain your working process clearly with some insight demonstrated as well as evidence of some understanding of multimedia. 40-49% – Satisfactory Your piece will be largely complete but insubstantial and poorly executed, and will employ only a limited range of media. It will not all work and will demonstrate only a limited understanding and ability to apply methods and tools covered in class. It will be cliched in content and concept and show little creativity. Planning and research will be only just enough and your wiki entries may be insubstantial, have some errors of language or use inappropriate registers. Your evaluative report will give only the barest outline of your working process and ability to reflect on your experience. 30-39% – Marginal Fail The project is not finished or is insubstantial and does not show adequate understanding or ability to use the methods and tools covered in class. The material submitted is derivative and static, does not employ a range of media or interaction types, and has only a slender relationship to the brief. Planning, design and research are poor quality or will be fewer than 10 pages. Your report is too short or may only be descriptive, and your wiki entries are poorly written or very short. There is limited evidence of effort or creativity being put in to the assessment. 20-29% – Clear Fail The project is very insubstantial and shows little understanding or ability to use the methods and tools covered in class at the level expected. The material submitted is derivative and static, does not employ a range of media or interaction types, and has little 00 50 relevance to the brief. Planning and research will be very limited and of poor quality. Your evaluative report is very short, of very poor quality, and your wiki entries will be almost non-existent and show no evidence of evaluation or comment. There is very little evidence of effort or creativity being put in to the assessment. 0-19% Little or Nothing of Merit Your work is almost non-existent. You have shown no understanding of the class content at all and have provided no evidence of effort or engagement. You have not submitted one or more required parts of the assignment.
6.1 Assignment Feedback Form Summative
Student Name/ID
Unit no. & Title
Assignment Title
Submission Date
Re-submission Date
Assessor Feedback
Assessor name
Date Received 1. submission
Date Received 2. submission
Grade:
Assessor Signature:
ate:
Resubmission Feedback: “Please note resubmission feedback is focused only on the resubmitted wort

AssignmentTutorOnline