Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 100 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 100
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Unit 11Annotated Bibliography – Advocating for Equality and Social Justice
Instructions
Supporting Materials: Textbook, scholarly journals
Select three articles from a professional social work journal about Social Justice, Advocacy, Empowerment in social work.
Write an annotated bibliography for each of the three articles selected.
The paper should be 6 pages (2 full pages per article) in length, typed, double-spaced, and use correct APA formatting.
RequirementsIncluded in the paper are the following:
The paper should include all three areas:
Reference- (included at the introduction of the article review)
Summary- A concise summary of the major points, statements, and facts of each article, main argument, the intended audience
Critique- The Pros and Cons of each article – what was insightful and what was missing. This should contain how this article relates to the information learned from the class readings, videos and discussions; your opinion about the author’s position and how the article fits in with your personal beliefs
PLEASE DO NOT USE THE ABSTRACT OF THE ARTICLE. THE BIBILIOGRAPHY MUST BE IN YOUR OWN WORDS.
This assessment addresses the following course objective(s):
1,2,3, 4, 5 & 6
Competencies 2,3,6
Complete this assignment and submit it to this assignment dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 pm CT.
Estimated time to complete: 6 hours
Assignment Resources
Rubric
Unit 11 Social Equity Annotated Bibliography Paper Rubric
Unit 11 Social Equity Annotated Bibliography Paper Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
10 pts5
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic.
9 pts4
Identifies a creative, focused and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic.
8 pts3
Identifies a focused and manageable/ doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.
7 pts2
Identifies a topic that while manageable/ doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.
6 pts1
Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.
0 pts0
Does not clearly identify a topics that is relative to the assignment.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views
20 pts5
Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/ approaches.
18 pts4
Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
16 pts3
Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/ approaches.
14 pts2
Relates information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.
12 pts1
Relates information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.
0 pts0
Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign Process
10 pts5
All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
9 pts4
Most critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
8 pts3
Some critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.
7 pts2
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.
6 pts1
Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.
0 pts0
The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology or framework.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
20 pts5
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
18 pts4
Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
16 pts3
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
14 pts2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
12 pts1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.
0 pts0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
10 pts5
States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.
9 pts4
States a conclusion that is a logical interpretation of the inquiry findings.
8 pts3
States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the inquiry findings.
7 pts2
States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.
6 pts1
States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings.
0 pts0
States an illogical conclusion from inquiry findings.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications
10 pts5
Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.
9 pts4
Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.
8 pts3
Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.
7 pts2
Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.
6 pts1
Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.
0 pts0
Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10 pts5
The paper exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
9 pts4
The paper exhibits a stronger command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.
8 pts3
The paper exhibits command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
7 pts2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
6 pts1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0 pts0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
10 pts5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
9 pts4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
8 pts3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
7 pts2
The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
6 pts1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0 pts0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.
10 pts
Total Points: 100