Limited time offer

Get 25% off your order

Use the code below at checkout — offer expires soon.

Your promo codeNURSE24
25%
Expires in: 10:00
Claim my 25% discount
LIMITED OFFER Get 25% off — use code BESTW25 | ✔ No AI ✔ No Plagiarism ✔ On-Time Delivery ✔ Free Revisions Claim Now
Skip to content
Get Help Now

Blog

Step-by-step guides and expert answers across all academic fields.

Uncategorized

ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MIS202 App, Web Design and Development Assessment UX Prototype Assignment Design and Essay Individual/Group Individual Length Prototypes and 1000 (+/-10%) essay Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Examine and apply web-based application architecture b) Propose and communicate solutions using web-based design to meet organisational needs Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 2.2 Weighting 30% Total Marks marks Task Summary In this assessment, you will first read and understand a case study on the development of a website that serves as a platform for students to find budget accommodation. You will then be required to complete a number of tasks that help you to understand the functional requirements of the website. You will also be addressing the architecture design of the website and developing a prototype for the website in the case study. Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task. Context This assessment examines your ability to identify key users of an information system, as well as how you understand and articulate their requirements. Understanding and communicating users’ requirements is normally the first step in web development and a correct understanding of the users’ requirements is crucial to the success of a web development project. You will also apply the knowledge you learnt about web application architecture to a case study. Prototyping is a commonly used and efficient way to elicit and validate users’ requirements. In this assessment, you will also demonstrate your ability to develop a prototype for a website. Task Instructions You first need to read the case study attached under this brief in the Assessment section on Blackboard. Assessment Tasks Refer to the case study to complete the following tasks. Task 1 (6%) In addition to the room details listed in the case study, list at least three pieces of information that you expect to see when looking for a room on such a website and explain why that piece of information is needed. No word limit requirements. Task 2 (9%) In addition to the management reports listed in the case study, list at least three other reports that may assist business decision making. Describe each report and how they can be used to facilitate business decision making in this case. No word limit requirements. Task 3.1 (8%) Identify users for the website in the case study. No word limit requirements. Task 3.2 (16%) Using the information provided in the case study, your common sense and your experience with similar websites, list at least two functional requirements for each user you identified in the previous task. Your answer in this task should not exceed 400 words. Task 4 (25%) Describe the application of the three-layer architecture (presentation layer, business logic layer, and data persistence layer) for the website in the case study. Give specific examples for each layer. Discuss the relationship between client-server architecture and three-layer architecture, and answer which layer(s) of the three-layer architecture is/are on the client side and which on the server side. Your answer in this task should not exceed 600 words altogether. Task 5 (36%) Draw a website prototype for the website in the case study. You must NOT use HTML/CSS/JavaScript to build a website at this stage. You must draw the prototype on sheets of paper. The website prototype must comprehensively include all the functional requirements described in the case study as well as the requirements you identified in Task 1 and 2 for each user that was either described in the case study or identified by you in Task 3.1. General Assessment Requirement Incomprehensible submissions: Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks where relevant. Case study: Assessment response must focus on the hypothetical case study given in the Task Instructions. Any assessment items that do not address the case study may be awarded 0 (zero) marks. Track changes: If you use Track Changes when writing your assessment, you must ensure that the submitted document is the final and correct version of the document. That is, if your submitted a report that contains Track Changes or Comments, or any other editing marks, it may be awarded 0 (zero) marks. It is your responsibility to submit the final and correct version of your report. Check against the marking criteria: Before submitting your assessment, you should check it against the assessment criteria and the marking rubric included in this specification to ensure that you have satisfactorily addressed all the criteria that will be used to mark your submission. Academic language: All submissions should be thoroughly proofread for spelling, typographical or grammatical errors before being submitted. Do not rely on the ‘spell-check’ function in your word processing program. If, for example, ‘affect’ is substituted for ‘effect’, your program may not detect the error. Referencing: It is essential that you use the appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here: http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing Submission Instructions: ALL students must submit ONE Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx) for Task 1–4 and ONE ZIP document containing a website prototype via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MIS202 App, Web Design and Development. Physical copies/email submissions are not accepted. DO NOT Zip the Microsoft Word file: Students must NOT zip the Microsoft Word document and submit it as one single zip/compressed file. Complete and correct submission: Assessments, once submitted, are FINAL and therefore cannot be modified. The onus is on you to ensure that your submissions are final, correct (correct files in the correct format) and complete before submitting to Blackboard. You are expected to begin this assessment when you begin the trimester, especially as you relate the learning activities (formative assessment) in the modules to this and the other (summative) assessments. Be sure to keep several drafts of your work as well as your notes and any sources you used to draw on when preparing your report. Extensions will be considered only in extenuating circumstances when the student has applied before the due date. At that point, students are required to provide the latest draft, in case the extension is not granted, and to demonstrate they have earnestly done everything to avoid lateness. Students are responsible for keeping appropriate back-ups and drafts of their assignments and to submit the correct version. Torrens University Australia’s policies apply to the preparation and submission of this assignment. Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Task 1 (6%) ? List three pieces of information for the website (3 marks) ? Explain the relevance for each piece of information (3 marks) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Task 2 (9%) ? List three other reports that may assist business decision making (3 marks) ? Provide a detailed description for each report (3 marks) ? Explain how the report can be used for business decision-making. (3 marks) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Task 3.1 (8%) ??Identify at least four users for the website (8 marks) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Task 3.2 (16%) For each user, list two functional requirements. These must be: N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A MIS202_Assessment_1_Brief_Design and Essay_Module Due 2.2 Page 4 of 5 • clearly described, • specific and • verifiable (16 marks) Task 4 (25%) ? Describe the application of threelayer architecture to the website with specific examples. ? Discuss the relationship between client-server architecture and threelayer architecture. ? Correctly identify which layer(s) of the three-layer architecture is/are on the client side and which on the server side. The writing demonstrates limited or no understanding of three-layer and clientserver architecture. The writing demonstrates functional understanding of three-layer and clientserver architecture. The writing demonstrates sound understanding of three-layer and clientserver architecture. The writing demonstrates thorough understanding of three-layer and clientserver architecture. The writing demonstrates thorough and indepth understanding of three-layer and client-server architecture. Task 5 (36%) ??Develop a website prototype for the website • The prototype is complete, that is, it demonstrates all major functional requirement for all users of the website. • The prototype is reflective of the case, that is, all the functions demonstrated in the prototype are relevant to the case study. Many major functional requirements are not demonstrated in the prototype. Many demonstrated features are not relevant to the case study. Some of the major functional requirements are demonstrated in the prototype. Some of the demonstrated features are relevant to the case study. A substantial number of major functional requirements are demonstrated in the prototype. A substantial number of demonstrated features are relevant to the case study. Most of the major functional requirements are demonstrated in the prototype. Most of the demonstrated features are relevant to the case study. All major functional requirements are demonstrated in the prototype. All demonstrated features are highly relevant to the case study. MIS202_Assessment_1_Brief_Design and Essay_Module Due 2.2 Page 5 of 5

GET ALL YOUR ACADEMIC HELP AT ESSAYLINK.NET ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MIS202 App, Web Design and Development Assessment UX Prototype Assignment…

Uncategorized

ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MIS203 Micro-services Architecture Cloud and Web IS Assessment Assessment 3: Case Study Report Individual/Group Individual Length 2500 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Identify and explore the key elements and applications of microservice, cloud computing, web-based information systems b) Analyse existing technologies and apply IS problem solving skills to address organisational needs c) Explain and communicate microservices, Cloud Computing and Web-based Information Systems solutions to organisational stakeholders Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 4.2 (Week 8). Weighting 40% Total Marks 100 marks Task Summary In response to issues and tasks raised in the case study provided, research and develop a 2500 word report that addresses the organisation’s needs. You first communicate your understating of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems with stakeholders to make a strong case before providing your recommendations as an IS professional. Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this assessment. Context When you begin working as an IS professional, you will be called upon regularly by clients to listen to their requirements, analyse the underlying issues and to identify appropriate solutions. This task allows you to take the concepts that you have learned from Modules 1-4 (history of computers, computer architecture, service-orientated architecture, cloud computing, cloud services, cloud deployment models, web-based IS, microservice communication, service modelling, integration and deployment) and to put your knowledge into practice in order to address the needs of an organisation. Task Instructions First read and examine the case study in the briefing document for Assessment 3 (attached under the Assessment 3 Brief in Blackboard). The case study will provide details on the background of the company and some of the issues and challenges that they are facing. The company is willing to benefit from implementing microservice architecture, cloud computing and web-based Information Systems solutions, but needs your advice as an IS professional to analyse the issues and to determine how best to resolve them. The report should consist of the following structure: Please write a 2500-word report containing your solution plan. To complete this assessment task, you must: A title page with subject code and name, assignment title, student’s name, student number, and lecturer’s name. Introduction (250-300 words), that will also serve as your statement of purpose for the proposal— this means that you will tell the reader what you are going to cover in your proposal. You will need to inform the reader of: a) Your area of research and its context b) The key elements you will be addressing c) What the reader can expect to find in the body of the report Body of the report (1900-2000 words), you will need to Write a report with the following sections: • A definition and introduction to Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems • Examples of successful implementation of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems for at least three companies in different industries. You should include the benefit these technologies brought to them. You should also discuss the challenges they faced in the implementation of these three technologies; • Make sure to focus on the aspects of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web- Based Information Systems that fit well with the company’s business model • Discuss the challenges of creating a new system using Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems Note: Use appropriate headings in the body of the report. Do NOT use generic words such as ‘Body, Body of the Report, Tasks’ as section headings. Create meaningful headings and subheadings that reflect the topic and content of your report. This is where you talk about Microservices, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems to convince stakeholders that they are reliable solutions for their potential problems and needs. This will set the tone for your recommendations. Make sure to include three examples for successful implementation of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems in your discussions. The Conclusion (250-300 words) will summarise any findings or recommendations that the report puts forward regarding the concepts covered in the report. Format of the report The report should use font Arial or Calibri 11 point, be line spaced at 1.5 for ease of reading, and have page numbers on the bottom of each page. If diagrams or tables are used, due attention should be given to pagination to avoid loss of meaning and continuity by unnecessarily splitting information over two pages. Diagrams must carry the appropriate captioning. Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage. You are strongly advised to read the rubric, which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading the assignment—this will give you a clear picture of what a successful report looks like. Submission Instructions Submit Assessment 3 via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MIS203. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Academic Integrity All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online. Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Definition and introduction to Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems 30% Failed to provide a definition for Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems or the definitions are fundamentally incorrect. The answer demonstrated a limited understanding of the concept of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems. Key aspects are overlooked or incorrect. Defines Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems with errors. The answer demonstrated a basic understanding of the concept of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems. Some key aspects are overlooked or incorrect. There are some minor errors in the definition of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems. The answer demonstrates understanding of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems. Key aspects are correctly described. Correct definition of and comprehensive introduction to Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web- Based Information Systems. The answer demonstrated a clear and detailed understanding of the concept of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and WebBased Information Systems. Correct definition of and comprehensive introduction to Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web- Based Information Systems. The answer demonstrated a very in-depth understanding of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and WebBased Information Systems. Three examples of successful implementation of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web- Based Information Systems 30% Provided examples of successful implementation of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web- Based Information Systems for at most one company in different industries. Did not include the benefit Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web- Based Information Systems brought to each of the companies, or the benefit is too general to be considered relevant. Provided examples of successful implementation of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems for at least two companies in different industries. Did not include the benefit Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems brought to each of the companies, or the benefit is too general to be considered relevant. Provided examples of successful implementation of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web- Based Information Systems for at least two companies in different industries. Included the benefit Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web- Based Information Systems brought to each of the companies, but the benefit is somewhat general. Provided examples of successful implementation of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web- Based Information Systems for at least three companies in different industries. Included the benefit Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web- Based Information Systems brought to each of the companies, but there is some room for improvement. Provided examples of successful implementation of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web- Based Information Systems for at least three companies in different industries. Included the benefit Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web- Based Information Systems brought to each of the companies. MIS203_Assessment_3_Brief_Case Study Report_Module Due 4.2 Page 4 of 5 Did not discuss the challenges each of the companies faced in the implementation of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and WebBased Information Systems Basic discussion of the challenges each of the companies faced in the implementation of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems. Some key challenges have been overlooked. Discusses the key challenges some of the companies faced in the implementation of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web- Based Information Systems, but the discussion is not thorough. Discussed the challenges each of the companies faced in the implementation of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web- Based Information Systems, but the discussion is not thorough. Thoroughly discussed the challenges each of the companies faced in the implementation of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and WebBased Information Systems Strength of Recommendations to the address business needs 20% The recommendations are not relevant to the business model and business needs. The recommendations are relevant to the business model and business needs but partially discussed. Appropriate recommendations presented and discussed. Insightful recommendations are presented and discussed. Exceptional and insightful recommendations are presented and discussed. Conclusion 10% The presented conclusion is summative in nature, and/or there are other significant problems with its execution. Makes an attempt to roll-up from the analysis provided in the paper. There may be summative elements, but the focus of the conclusion is in providing something for the reader to go away with. Provides a concluding set of remarks that set a tone for the reader to do something with the report. It may lay out future directions or recommendations for the reader clearly based on the analysis from the report. Elegantly concludes the paper with a compelling case for future direction that argues a case for continuing or exploring Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and Web-Based Information Systems in the hypothetical firm. Expertly concludes from the analysis presented in the earlier report. Is critical of its own analysis but cuts efficiently to the heart of the subject at hand, providing an inspiring future direction for exploration or continuation of Microservice Architecture, Cloud Computing, and WebBased Information Systems. Written communication 10% No external resources used or referenced Some credible references are used to support ideas External resources are inaccurately presented and referenced using APA Credible references are partially used to support ideas External resources are partially presented and referenced using APA Credible references are used to support ideas External resources are thoroughly presented and referenced using APA Credible references are expertly used to support ideas External resources are thoroughly presented and referenced using APA MIS203_Assessment_3_Brief_Case Study Report_Module Due 4.2 Page 5 of 5

GET ALL YOUR ACADEMIC HELP AT ESSAYLINK.NET ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MIS203 Micro-services Architecture Cloud and Web IS Assessment Assessment 3:…

Uncategorized

ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF Subject Code and Title PROJ6004 Contracts and Procurement Assessment Case Study Response Individual/Group Individual Length 600-800 word original post, plus a minimum of 2 x 300 word responses (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Critically evaluate the risks associated with contract and procurement management approaches b) Evaluate procurement requirements to formulate procurement processes in order to initiate contracts Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 2 (Module 2.2; Week 4 for 12 week sessions; Week 2 for 6 week sessions). Weighting 20% Total Marks 20 marks Assessment Task Critically read the assigned case study, available from either the Subject Learning Resources tab on the course homepage or as sent to you by the Learning Facilitator as an announcement. Read the Module 1-2 learning resources, especially those focused on project risk. Engage with other students by posting a 600-800-word discussion forum post and 300-word critiques detailing your response to the question below. Please refer to the instructions for details on how to complete this task. Context Procurement and contracts are integral to successful project management. Planning for purchases and acquisitions, requests for proposal, vendor selection, contract administration, and contract closure are integral parts of the process. Learning from case studies and benchmarking against better practices, standards and excellence is vital to understand complexity of issues and successful strategies for procurement and contract management. It will also ensure improved responsiveness to key issues, promote supplier client relationships through proactive management of risks and ultimately deliver higher level of focus on performance-based outcomes. Assessment 1 is a discussion with other students of key issues to better understand the principles of project procurement, challenges, and risks, as well as develop key procurement themes and quantify financial exposure. This assessment requires that you critically evaluate the risks associated with contract and procurement management approaches. This assessment requires that you answer the following question, evaluating the following risk and procurement concepts: “What are some important procurement risks that typically exist for large or complex projects? What procurement/financial risks exist in the assigned case study, and what strategies do you propose for mitigating these risks?”. To do so, address the following concepts in your post: • Identify 2-3 typical procurement risks required to be managed for complex projects • Identify 2-3 specific financial risks from the case study project • Propose possible procurement/financial risk mitigation actions for the case study project, and explain these relate to better practice guidelines • Identify possible areas for further vendor negotiations and management that you believe are important to achieve a successful contract completion • Identify areas of key accountability that exist for the project manager and procurement manager in facilitating a successful outcome for the case study project To answer this question, you will need to: (a) Post a 600-800-word (+/-10%) response to this question, based on your informed opinion and demonstrated knowledge of project management procurement risks, project lifecycles, and PMBoK, to the Discussion Forum on the Learning Portal. (b) Respond to a minimum of two other students’ posts by critiquing their opinion and comparing it with yours in 300 words (+/-10%). Instructions 1. Read module 1-2 learning resources, particularly those relevant to procurement risk, to familiarise yourself with fundamental concepts. Critically reflect on your readings to form an opinion. Commence writing your opinion to answer the question and support that opinion by using at least six (6) references from academic or industry literature. Cite these references in your opinion of 600-800 words both in-text and as a reference list at the end of your opinion piece. The word count does not include the reference list. It is expected that you will undertake sufficient research and reading to effectively contribute and share ideas individually. This is important for discussions to achieve sufficient depth of analysis as to provide high quality information to satisfy the requirements for the case study analysis – based on the above guidelines. 2. Read other students’ posts. Think about their opinion and try to compare and contrast them with yours. This will allow you to “critique” the views of at least two other students. You can do this by highlighting the things you agree with and those you disagree with in their post. You need to justify and explain your critique of their opinion. In your response, you will need to refer to some of the literature. Your responses will need to be a minimum of 300 words. This does not include the reference list Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool Submission Instructions Submit this task via the Assessment 1 link in the main navigation menu in PROJ6004 – Contracts and Procurement. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Academic Integrity Declaration I declare that except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly. Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Understanding of the Project 30% 10% Superficial analysis of the project context and complexities Rudimentary analysis of the project context and complexities Proficient analysis of the project context and complexities Through analysis of the project context and complexities Sophisticated analysis of the project context and key elements 10% The project complexities and nuances have not been understood Basic evaluation of the project complexities and nuances Thoughtful evaluation of the project complexities and nuances Discerning evaluation of the project complexities and nuances Insightful evaluation of the project complexities and nuances 10% Responses to the key questions lack intellectual rigour and resolution Functional responses to the key questions posed Responses to the key questions posed show developing judgement Astute responses to the key questions posed Considered and highly resolved responses to the key questions posed Application of Learned Theories and Frameworks 20% 10% Learned theories and frameworks have not been understood or interpreted incorrectly Demonstrates a basic level of understanding of learned theories and frameworks Demonstrates proficient level of understanding of learned theories and frameworks Demonstrates an advanced level of understanding of learned theories and frameworks Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of learned theories and frameworks 10% Learning theories and frameworks have not been used to support discussion contribution Learning theories and frameworks are applied at a superficial level to somewhat support discussion contribution Effectively synthesises and applies theories and frameworks to support discussion contribution Persuasively synthesises and applies theories and frameworks to support discussion contribution Eloquently synthesises and applies theories and frameworks to support discussion contribution Effective Contribution to Discussion 30% 10% Student’s contribution to the discussion and engagement in the developing conversation is limited or non-existent Student has only engaged in the developing conversation in a minor way Student is engaged in the discussion and responsive to the developing conversations Student initiates some discussions and shows consistent engagement in the developing conversations Student shows leadership in activating community discussions and contributing to developing conversations 10% Original post lacks depth and consideration, with little opportunity for further group discussion Original post considered and offers relevant ideas for group discussion Original post is highly engaging and offers well reasoned arguments for group discussion Original post is conceptually evocative and and offers carefully considered ideas for initiating group discussion Original post is insightful and offers highly stimulating, authentic thought for initiating group discussion 10% No response posts have been made Response posts have been made, but lack depth and consideration Response posts are considered and constructive Response posts are constructive and engaging, supporting further group learning Response posts are encouraging and provocative, supporting further group learning Language and Communication 10% Significant grammar, spelling and punctuation errors resulting in a lack of clarity to ideas communicated. Ideas are understandable, but notable spelling and punctuation errors evident throughout. Ideas are communicated successfully but some minor spelling and punctuation errors are evident. Ideas are clearly communicated with only minor punctuation errors. Ideas are flawlessly communicated with no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Research and Referencing Quality 10% 5% No independent research beyond lecture material Superficial independent research beyond lecture material Substantial research beyond lecture material Extensive independent research beyond lecture material Exhaustive independent research beyond lecture material 5% Citations of sources and references used to inform ideas are not evident Some citations of sources and references used to inform ideas Proficient citations of sources and references used to inform ideas Significant citation of sources and references used to inform ideas Exemplary citation of sources and references used to inform ideas The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment SLO a) Critically evaluate the risks associated with contract and procurement management approaches SLO c) Evaluate procurement requirements to formulate procurement processes in order to initiate contracts

GET ALL YOUR ACADEMIC HELP AT ESSAYLINK.NET ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF Subject Code and Title PROJ6004 Contracts and Procurement Assessment Case Study Response Individual/Group Individual…