The term net neutrality refers to the equality of data as it is transferred over the Internet. For instance, the data from an individual and the data from Microsoft are treated the same. A recent controversy surrounding the cable giant Comcast brought up the possibility of ISPs interfering with the delivery of Internet data. According to complaints by customers, Comcast has been blocking the use of P2P sites like BitTorrent to download movies, music, and other large files. Comcast, like most ISPs, includes a statement in its terms of service that allows it to use tools to “efficiently manage its networks,” in order to prevent those customers using a higher than normal level of bandwidth from interfering with the access of other customers. However, the Comcast issue was considered by many to be a blatant net neutrality issue—blocking access to multimedia from sources other than its own cable sources.
Do you think the actions taken by Comcast were ethical?
Does an ISP have a right to block selected Internet traffic? Why or why not?
Was there a more ethical way Comcast could have handled the problem of some users consuming a higher than normal level of bandwidth?
The post Net neutrality first appeared on COMPLIANT PAPERS.